Skip to main content


Worked for moving quick and light on the trail, we separate The North Face's deft climbing boot. Consistently, slants in climbing footwear are moving more toward quick and light. Numerous individuals currently pick lightweight climbing shoes over customary boots, and through explorers are in any event, going after trail sprinters. The North Face's Endurus Hike Mid GTX is a fascinating half and half plan: it's a higher and somewhat stiffer rendition of the padded Endurus trail sprinter (TR). I put the Endurus Hike Mid GTX to the test on the 4-day Huemul Circuit in Patagonia, going over moraines, down soak scree-loaded inclines, and through swamps. The following are my appearance on the boot's solace, soundness and backing, footing, best uses, fit and estimating, and then some. To perceive how it measures up to the challenge, see our article on the best climbing boots.



At the point when I originally put on the Endurus Hike Mid, my underlying idea was, "Stunning, this boot is agreeable." In my feeling, comfort is maybe its greatest selling point. The XtraFoam padded sole, in addition to the OrthoLite footbed and impact point support, give a padded vibe suggestive of a Hoka One trail sprinter. Moreover, a calfskin overlay enables the boot to fit in with the foot pleasantly. I required positively no break-in period with the Endurus, despite the fact that I abandoned them on a 4-day hiking trip in Patagonia while conveying a 30-pound load over intense territory. As a matter of fact, this was harsher use than they are proposed for—we consider them best on set up trails that aren't excessively rough—however even on mile 15 of the most recent day, my feet were wet and tired yet discernibly agreeable.


At 1 pound 10.8 ounces, the Endurus Hike Mid is extremely lightweight for a climbing boot. A trail-running shoe like the Altra Lone Peak 3.5 weighs in at 1 pound 1.4 ounces, while the well known Salomon X Ultra 3 Mid GTX gauges more at 1 pound 13.4 ounces however offers extensively greater dependability and security. Maybe the nearest examination we can attract is to the Adidas Outdoor Terrex Swift R2 Mid GTX, which has a comparative trail sprinter like feel yet comes in marginally lighter at 1 pound 9.2 ounces. Everything considered, the Endurus Hike Mid GTX feels incredibly light for a mid-tallness boot and not in any way shape or form inconvenient. It absolutely keeps up a greater amount of the vibe of a trail sprinter than a climbing boot, which is something to be thankful for.

Security and Support

Despite the fact that the Endurus has the over-the-lower leg tallness of a boot and a stiffer padded sole than its trail running (TR) partner, don't expect the help of a normal climbing model. I saw the padded sole as flexy and padded underneath—it's responsive yet not especially defensive. The delicate and light work upper moved with my foot more than it upheld it, very like the vibe of a trail sprinter. While bearing the heaviness of a medium-term pack, I saw that my feet needed to work more enthusiastically than ordinary to give steadiness over the different forms of the trail.

That being stated, I wore the Endurus Hike Mids over free bone, rock fields, and icy masses with no huge lower leg rolls or sore feet. However, on the trickiest territory, I absolutely ended up wanting for a stiffer boot. For those with powerless lower legs or acclimated with having progressively steady footwear do the balancing out work for them, this is a significant drawback. A progressively perfect alternative for the excursion we did would be a midweight boot like the Salomon Quest 4D 3 GTX.


My involvement with The North Face Endurus Mid GTX is that underneath, it's more like a trail sprinter than a climbing boot. The Vibram XS Trek sole is obtained from the Endurus TR with 4mm carries and a climbing centered track structure rather than 3.5mm drags, and it furnishes moderate footing with an accentuation on adaptability (Vibram even prescribes this particular elastic for use in the exercise center). This makes for wonderful footing and development on earth trails, yet I ended up moving carefully over wet rocks in the wake of having the boots slip various occasions. I would much rather climb over wet roots, rocks, and ice sheets with a stiffer padded sole and stickier, firmer elastic (the La Sportiva TX3 or TX4, for instance).

Waterproofing and Breathability

The Endurus Hike Mid has a Gore-Tex layer and is promoted as being totally waterproof. What's more, the stature and gusseted tongue include an additional obstruction of security, keeping water out even through profound puddles where a low-top shoe or trail sprinter would be defenseless. I wore the boot through rivers and miles of mucky ground on the Huemul Circuit and was intrigued with how dry my feet remained. On a couple of events, I stepped in water profound enough that it leaked overtop, yet with the lightweight work uppers, the boots broadcast out rapidly for a waterproof form.

Despite the fact that the Endurus and its lightweight plan surrenders a great deal as far as steadiness and insurance, the boot's breathability is especially amazing. The work upper and The North Face's exclusive FlashDry material along the neckline work superbly at carrying dampness to the essence of the texture where it vanishes. Boots made with a Gore-Tex film are innately less breathable, yet the Hike Mid GTX appeared to wick dampness effectively. Accordingly, I never experienced overheating, even while climbing in padded fleece socks on warm days.

Toe and Ankle Protection

The Endurus Hike Mid straddles the line between a trail sprinter and climbing boot as far as toe and lower leg security. Albeit planned with an intense TPU toe top, the vibe and assurance are like a running shoe like the Altra Lone Peak 3.5 (and even not exactly the rough La Sportiva Wildcat). On the precarious landscape of the difficult Huemul Circuit, I positively ended up wanting for a beefier toe top to prepare for stubbed toes.

Also, The North Face planned the Endurus with a stone plate for included unbending nature and insurance. This and the thick padding kept me satisfactorily shielded from the trail underneath, yet despite everything I felt shakes and roots more than I'm utilized to from a stiffer climbing shoe or boot. Given its mid-stature structure and cushioned neckline, the Endurus offers more lower leg insurance than a regular trail sprinter. Notwithstanding, the work material is light and vaporous, so don't anticipate an incredibly tough boundary between your foot and the components.

Strength and Construction

More than in some other class, the Endurus Hike Mid beats a standard trail sprinter regarding toughness. The stature and shake plate enable the boot to help the foot mile after mile without losing its shape. The fortified softened cowhide uppers shield the work from tears, and the excellent Vibram sole on my pair still can't seem to give indications of wear. I don't anticipate that it should keep going up to a harder (and heavier) hiking boot, yet the Hike Mid endure a 4-day trek in fine structure, regardless of being exposed to landscape and a heap that surpassed its expected use.

Best Uses

We don't as a rule incorporate a "best uses" segment in our footwear audits, but since of our testing condition (the extremely testing Huemul Circuit in Patagonia) and our not exactly gleaming survey, it appears to be justified here. The North Face Endurus Hike Mid GTX is extraordinary in that it endeavors to combine the advantages of a trail sprinter and a mid-stature climbing boot. Does it succeed?

We think the Hike Mid GTX is too padded and unsupportive for conveying medium-term packs with burdens over roughly 20 to 25 pounds. Besides, it's not the perfect footwear choice for courses that take you off standard climbing trails onto rocks, scree fields, or onto ice sheets—the boot basically doesn't offer the sort of footing, assurance, or dependability required for intense territory. In these circumstances, you'd be in an ideal situation with a lightweight climbing boot like the Lowa Renegade GTX Mid, or in any event, something lighter like the Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX. The Endurus Hike Mid likewise isn't a perfect trail sprinter: the mid-stature basically is unreasonably inconvenient for expanded runs.

Where the Hike Mid totally flourishes, be that as it may, is on soil trails and on the feet of quick moving, light-pressing climbers who are searching for a somewhat progressively steady and defensive option in contrast to their trail-running shoes. Through explorers observe: this may be a strong decision for your next trip. In general, the Endurus Hike Mid can be a superb trade off between a trail sprinter, climbing shoe, and climbing boot, in case you're willing to surrender some presentation at either end of the range.

Fit and Sizing

I ordinarily wear a ladies' 8.5 and the Endurus Hike Mid fit incredible by and large. The binding framework is somewhat remarkable with the best 2 arrangements of eyelets enabling you to decide to either nourish the bands through fixed openings or utilize the snares outwardly (it's for the most part a matter of individual inclination). Notwithstanding, I did nearly maximize the range for fixing the boot because of its spacious inside. I have wide, high-volume feet, however I was amazed how much space despite everything I had even after my feet expand up a piece during the exploring trip. I would prescribe it as a fine choice for those with customary and wide feet, yet it likely will would neglect to suit those with a restricted profile.

What We Like

Quick and light on the trail yet progressively tough, waterproof, and defensive than most trail sprinters.

An amazingly agreeable and padded boot that expects practically zero break-in period.

Finds some kind of harmony among waterproofing and breathability.

What We Don't

Footing and soundness were disappointing.

Not strong enough for testing climbs yet unreasonably inconvenient for genuine trail runs. There are not many conditions in which this would be your best footwear alternative (maybe through climbing or a blend of quick climbing and running on building up trails).

The Competition

As referenced over, the Endurus Hike Mid GTX is illustrative of the pattern toward lighter climbing footwear. It additionally consolidates a prominent element of current trail-running shoes: a thick, profoundly padded sole. The net outcome is a quite decent over-the-lower leg climber, if you know about its restrictions. Piled facing Salomon's X Ultra 3 Mid GTX, which is outstanding amongst other lightweight boots available, the Endurus misses the mark. The North Face boot wins out in weight by around 3 ounces for the pair, however does not have the help, footing, and insurance that you get with flexible Salomon plan. Except if the weight contrast merits every one of the tradeoffs for you, the X Ultra is our favored choice for climbing and exploring.

A more straightforward rival regarding weight is the Adidas Terrex Swift R2 Mid GTX. Astonishingly, the Swift really undermines the Endurus by 1.6 ounces for the pair, and it imparts a comparative development to a ton of flex underneath, a Gore-Tex waterproof film, and TPU overlays to secure the work upper. Where the two boots contrast the most is padding: the Endurus has a tall padded sole that is delicate and entirely agreeable, while the Swift is more slender and gives more input from the trail. Neither can coordinate the inside and out execution of the X Ultra 3, yet once more, in the event that you need a superlight boot for day climbing or ultralight hiking, they're reasonable choices.

Taking the over-the-lower leg trail-running shoe to the following level is Altra's Lone Peak 3.0 NeoShell. Basically a taller and incompletely waterproof adaptation of their famous trail sprinter, the Lone Peak is deft, adaptable, and truly agreeable. At 1 pound 6.8 ounces, it's essentially lighter than the Endurus, yet still incorporates a stone plate and has magnificent footing with its mark profound hauls (Altra uses a somewhat extraordinary elastic compound with the Neoshell model). We like the Lone Peak for moderate outings in warm climate, however for this situation, the Endurus is the better-adjusted shoe. The Altra's NeoShell liner is just in part waterproof, so even a shallow stream intersection will let in some dampness. Likewise, the Lone Peak's wide fit isn't for everybody and can feel messy on troublesome territory. Neither one of the options would replace the X Ultra 3 Mid in our wardrobe, however the Endurus gets the edge here as the predominant climbing boot.


Popular posts from this blog


Running on differed and testing trails is a much needed reprieve from the repetitiveness of beating asphalt (or far more atrocious, the belt of a treadmill). Even better, trail running is a gigantically simple game to get into. The following are our top trail sprinters of 2019, from adaptable and lightweight shoes for smooth trails to extreme and stable structures for handling specialized or rugged territory. In case you're requiring any foundation data on shoe types and highlights, see our trail-running shoe examination table and purchasing counsel underneath the picks. Furthermore, for a more extensive take a gander at the market including some of our preferred street sprinters, see our article on the best running shoes.

Best Overall Trail-Running Shoe
1. Saucony Peregrine ISO ($120)
Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 5 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 4mm
What we like: Excellent mix of traction, comfort, and weight.
What we don’t: A bit too flexy for highly technical terrain.



Regardless of your capacity level, an agreeable boot is a flat out need. Nothing ruins a decent powder day quicker than cold or agonizing feet, and sick fitting boots additionally risk not appropriately moving vitality to your skis and accordingly hurting your exhibition. In the midst of this fate and unhappiness, notwithstanding, is the welcome news that ski boots have never been more foot-accommodating than they are today. Most new boots have adjustable liners and some even accompany heat-adaptable shells. The following are our picks for the best downhill ski boots of 2019-2020. For more data, see our correlation table and purchasing counsel beneath the picks. To finish your elevated unit, look at our articles on the best all-mountain skis and ski ties.

Best Overall Downhill Ski Boot
1. Lange RX 120 ($600)
Last: 97 or 100mm (narrow or medium width)
Flex: 120 (advanced skiers)
Other flexes: 100, 130
What we like: Successful all-mountain adaptation of a downhill racing boot.
What we d…


Hoka One One has dabbled in hiking footwear in the past, but they’ve truly jumped into the fray with their new Sky lineup. Eager to test the boots against long-time favorites, we took the new speed-focused Sky Toa into the Palisades Backcountry of eastern Idaho. All told, the lightweight build can’t match the protection and stability of a burlier backpacking boot, but we were nevertheless pleased by the shoe’s comfort, traction, and support on easy-to-moderate trails. Below we break down the Sky Toa’s comfort, weight, traction, stability and support, durability, sizing and fit, and more. To see how it stacks up, see our article on the best hiking boots.

Hoka One One Sky Toa
Price: $170
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 12 oz. (women's size 8.5)
Waterproof: Yes (eVent)
What we like: Extremely comfortable thanks to the thick cushioning and flexible construction.
What we don’t: Lacks the support, stiffness, and durability needed for carrying a heavy pack or traversing challenging terrain.